People Who Break The Law Should Be Warned Instead Of Punished

IELTS Writing Task 2 with sample answer.

You should spend about 40 minutes on this task.

Write at least 250 words.

In many situations, people who break the law should be warned instead of punished

To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Sample Answer:

The debate around whether people who break the law should be warned or punished has been a controversial issue for many years. This essay will argue that while some offenders should be warned, punishment should also be used in certain cases.

Firstly, it is important to consider certain offences that are minor and not considered to be a serious threat to society. A warning may be sufficient in such cases, as this can help to educate the offender and make them aware of the consequences of their actions. For example, a driver who has been caught speeding may be given a warning and sent on a course to help them understand the importance of obeying the speed limit. This is beneficial as it helps to encourage the offender to become a responsible citizen and act within the law in the future.

However, there are also some offences that are more serious and require a harsher response. In these situations, a warning alone may not be seen as an adequate punishment. Crimes such as theft and assault should be seen as more serious, and so should be punished accordingly. This is because such offences can cause distress and harm to the victims and so a warning may not be sufficient in deterring the offender from repeating the same crime. Furthermore, if a harsher punishment is handed out, this can act as a deterrent to other potential offenders who may be considering committing the same offence.

In conclusion, it is clear that warnings should be used in some cases, such as minor offences, as this can help to educate the offender. However, when more serious crimes are committed, punishment should also be used to ensure that the offender is adequately dealt with and that it acts as a deterrent to others.