Improvements in health, education and trade are essential for the development

IELTS Writing Task 2 with sample answer.

You should spend about 40 minutes on this task.
Present a written argument or case to an educated reader with no specialist knowledge of the following topic.

Improvements in health, education and trade are essential for the development of poorer nations. However, the governments of richer nations should take more responsibility for helping the poorer nations in such areas.

To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
You should use your own ideas, knowledge and experience and support your arguments with examples and relevant evidence.

You should write at least 250 words.

Idea Generation for this essay:

In agreement of the given statement:

Trades should be promoted globally

  • Human should help each other and government of rich nations has a natural obligation to raise their helping hands to the nations who are struggling to improve their conditions.
  • Developed countries have better knowledge and research facilities and hence they should send expert doctors, teachers and other professionals to underdeveloped countries to train them.
  • Most of people in a poor country lead unhealthy life and have very less interest on education. Awareness campaigns and training facilities arranged by developed countries can help a lot to such poor countries.
  • Developed countries can send funds and other materials to poor nations to develop their education sector.
  • Poor nations often suffer from sufficient knowledge and research facilities and that’s why developed countries should help them deciding to develop their education and health care sector.
  • We would be able to live in a better world with unity if rich nations help the poor nations to eradicate their poverty and illiteracy.
  • Government of rich nations can utilize the manpower of less developed countries and thus more employment opportunities would be created in poor countries.
  • Trades should be promoted globally so that poor nations can export their resources to improve their economic conditions.
  • It is inhuman not to support poor nations. The amount of food wastage in first world countries could easily feed many poor people of the world.
  • Commerce without any double can assist less developed countries to stand strong on their own. But the facilities and aids should be provided by the affluent nations.

Disagreement with the given statement:

International aids often come with restriction

  • Poor nations should rely on their manpower and resources than being dependent on international aids.
  • The funds could be given by the rich nations but ultimately the government of the poor nations should prudently invest this amount for the greater good of the nations.
  • International aids often come with restriction and condition. So relying on this would not be a good idea for a poor nation.
  • The rich nations should help the less developed nations to a certain degree and on very basic and fundamental needs like education and healthcare. But ultimately the people and government’s willingness for progress would be the deciding factors for their development.
  • There are so many poor countries and they have so many problems. The government of a rich country can’t look after them all.
  • The government of rich nations do not have good relationship with all the nations and many of them are in direct clash with them. So relying on their aid would not be a good idea.

Model Answer :
It is the obvious fact that health, education and commerce are the most crucial matter for the progression of third world countries. The issue of whether or not the developed nations should take more program for assisting the less fortune nations in those sectors has sparked a heated debate. In that case, I contend that obviously wealthy nations should cooperate the poorer nation, but in different ways, such as, ensuring good governance.

Health, education and trade are the key tools for development. But, without good governance, no nation can achieve success in these domains. Most developing nations suffer from widespread corruption in absence of good governance.  These nations simply waste valuable resources in corruption, such as excessive private and public consumption. The corruption cripples the economy and the citizens are deprived of basic needs like health and education. On the top of that, the corruption also creates an adverse situation for trade and commerce. Thus, the lack of good governance impede the progress in health, education and trade.

Now, actually, what we need is to ensure good governance. In order to ride the wave to sustainable development, good governance needs to be focused on governance for meeting the basic needs of the citizens, such as food, shelter, health, primary education, social security. Here the point is how wealthy nations can play an effective role in ensuring good governance in the developing countries. The developed countries can promote good governance through many avenues. They should design a package program, for instance, actively support national processes of democratic transition.

In the process, they ought to provide the developing countries with policy advice and technical support and strengthening the capacity of institutions and individuals. They also can encourage the countries to improve accountability by enhancing transparency in policies. Bangladesh is a good example to be mentioned. In spite of adequate natural resources and industrious manpower, she cannot touch the optimum mark. The sole reason is the considerable lack of good governance. Furthermore, the developed countries always enjoy superior position in establishing trading rules and regulations. So, they should be generous during the negotiation of an international trade. Market access would be the great opportunity for the poorer nations.

In conclusion, the assistance in health or education is good. But when the question is sustainable development, ensuring good governance is the right field where the developed countries could cultivate for better crop.