You should spend about 40 minutes on this task.
Write about the following topic:
Directors and managers of organizations are often older people. Some people say that it is better for younger people to be leaders.
To what extend do you agree or disagree?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
You should write at least 250 words.
It is a common scene that older people occupy directors and managers of organization. View differs considerably when it comes to the point of whether or not older people should be leader of organization. Some people contend that leader should always be senior of a corporation. On the contrary, others assert that young people would take the role of directors and managers in a better way than older would do. While both ages have the qualities of being leader, I think it depends on the nature and function of particular organization and sometimes age is not concerned issue.
To start with, older people are ideally appropriate for the key positions in those organizations where experience is the chief concern, for example legal farms or accounting houses. The reason is older people are usually more skilled in communicating with clients, monitoring project, and most importantly, advising professional advice. On the other hand, young people need to be apprentice of mentor for several years in order to accomplish adequate practical knowledge to deal real problems. That is to say that experience comes with age and this is crucial for any leader. Moreover, older people usually have more authority which is required to lead or manage subordinates. Furthermore, a sense of responsibility is another signature trait for leader which is found in older people and often lacking in the young executives. These are the overall reasons why older people should be selected for leadership.
On the flip side, young executives are more suitable for some industries like information technology, since creative ideas and innovations are the main ingredients of company growth. This is because young people are usually more up-to-date and they are in close touch with the modern world and, therefore, they naturally have a flair for digital technology. Take Steve Jobs of Apple for example. He has innovated cutting-edge products of information technology. Actually, young executives are often more dynamic and forward thinking, for that they are more open to new ideas compared to their old counterparts. In addition, today’s business usually undergoes rapid changes. This fact suggests us that we need leaders who can devise new ways of doing things constantly. In this instance, we have no choice but young executives.
From what has been discussed above it is obvious that age alone is not a criterion of selection, though age and experience may reduce the chances of risks. If the young executives have all that traits a leader should have, then age is merely a number. That is to say that age does not matter as long as they have the efficacy to lead an organization.